13-32362645-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7928C>G(p.Ala2643Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000149 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000015 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
1
7
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.07
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 13-32362645-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32362645-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52436.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=4}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.7928C>G | p.Ala2643Gly | missense_variant | 17/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.7928C>G | p.Ala2643Gly | missense_variant | 17/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.7559C>G | p.Ala2520Gly | missense_variant | 17/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.7936C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 16/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251292Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135790
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
251292
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135790
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461872Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74350
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74350
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
3
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Oct 23, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Feb 04, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Ala2643Gly variant was identified as neutral in a functional assay assessing the ability of the variant to repair DNA damage by homologous recombination, and control of centriole amplification (Farrugia 2008). Another functional assay assessing splicing effects using a reporter minigene found no splicing defect and patient RNA behaved as wildtype (Thery 2011). The variant was also found to be neutral using a computational method using probabilistic likelihood ratios, predicting protein function impairment (Karchin 2008). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359018) “With unknown pathogenicity”, but no frequency information was provided; NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server project in 1 of 8600 European American alleles (frequency: 0.0001); the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 3 of 121376 chromosomes (frequency: 0.000025) (OR 3 individuals from a population of European (Non-Finnish) individuals and none from East Asian, Other, African, Latino, South Asian, or European (Finnish) individuals); Clinvitae database (3x), the ClinVar database (unclassified due to conflicting interpretations, with likely benign by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project, derived from Myriad reports, and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by BIC, and classification not provided by Invitae), the BIC database (3X with unknown clinical importance and pending classification), and UMD (unavailable). The p.Ala2643 residue was conserved in mammals but not other organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Two of 5 in-silico splicing software tools (NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, Human Splicing Finder, MaxEntScan, SpliceSiteFinder-like) predict creation of a 5' splicing site, although this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time; this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Jun 20, 2002 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 22, 2023 | Observed in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer, but also observed in unaffected controls (Thry et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2012; Shimelis et al., 2017; Mesman et al., 2018; Machackova et al., 2019; Wong et al., 2019); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 8156C>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22505045, 25447315, 24323938, 18451181, 23893897, 28283652, 26913838, 30212499, 22476429, 21673748, 19043619, 29988080, 31131967, 31469826, 31409081, 34597585, 25348012, 12228710) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 29, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 20, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 11, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7928C>G (p.Ala2643Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein, helical domain (IPR015252) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251292 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.7928C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer (example, Lu_2012, Thery_2011). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the BIC database (BRCA2 c.2309C>A, p.Ser770*), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Farrugia_2008, Mesman_2018). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on homology directed repair (HDR) activity. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Likely benign, n=4; VUS, n=3). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
T;T
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at