Variant 14-60509416-C-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_007374.3(SIX6):c.18C>A(p.Ile6Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000553 in 1,447,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SIX6
NM_007374.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.247

Variant links:

Genes affected

SIX6 (HGNC:10892): (SIX homeobox 6) The protein encoded by this gene is a homeobox protein that is similar to the Drosophila 'sine oculis' gene product. This gene is found in a cluster of related genes on chromosome 14 and is thought to be involved in eye development. Defects in this gene are a cause of isolated microphthalmia with cataract type 2 (MCOPCT2). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SIX6 links:

C14orf39 (HGNC:19849): (chromosome 14 open reading frame 39) Predicted to be involved in gamete generation and meiosis I. Predicted to be located in chromosome. Predicted to be active in central element. Implicated in primary ovarian insufficiency 18 and spermatogenic failure 52. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

C14orf39 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 14-60509416-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-60509416-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 882019.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.247 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SIX6	NM_007374.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.18C>A	p.Ile6Ile	synonymous_variant	1/2	ENST00000327720.6	NP_031400.2	O95475Q6P051
C14orf39	XM_047431324.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-144+5979G>T		intron_variant			XP_047287280.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SIX6	ENST00000327720.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.18C>A	p.Ile6Ile	synonymous_variant	1/2	1	NM_007374.3	ENSP00000328596.5		O95475
C14orf39	ENST00000556799.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.-144+5979G>T		intron_variant		4		ENSP00000451441.1		G3V3U9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000126

AC:

AN:

237894

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000771

AC XY:

AN XY:

129766

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000644

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000179

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000553

AC:

AN:

1447194

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000278

AC XY:

AN XY:

720328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000630

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Anophthalmia-microphthalmia syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jun 01, 2022

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.90

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over