14-60509419-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_007374.3(SIX6):c.21G>A(p.Leu7=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0289 in 1,599,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 756 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 44 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.030 ( 712 hom. )
Consequence
SIX6
NM_007374.3 synonymous
NM_007374.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.475
Genes affected
SIX6 (HGNC:10892): (SIX homeobox 6) The protein encoded by this gene is a homeobox protein that is similar to the Drosophila 'sine oculis' gene product. This gene is found in a cluster of related genes on chromosome 14 and is thought to be involved in eye development. Defects in this gene are a cause of isolated microphthalmia with cataract type 2 (MCOPCT2). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
C14orf39 (HGNC:19849): (chromosome 14 open reading frame 39) Predicted to be involved in gamete generation and meiosis I. Predicted to be located in chromosome. Predicted to be active in central element. Implicated in primary ovarian insufficiency 18 and spermatogenic failure 52. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 14-60509419-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-60509419-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 882020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.475 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0216 (3287/152330) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0336 (2287/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0325. There are 44 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1573 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 3287 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIX6 | NM_007374.3 | c.21G>A | p.Leu7= | synonymous_variant | 1/2 | ENST00000327720.6 | |
C14orf39 | XM_047431324.1 | c.-144+5976C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIX6 | ENST00000327720.6 | c.21G>A | p.Leu7= | synonymous_variant | 1/2 | 1 | NM_007374.3 | P1 | |
C14orf39 | ENST00000556799.1 | c.-144+5976C>T | intron_variant | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0216 AC: 3288AN: 152212Hom.: 44 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3288
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0201 AC: 4779AN: 237902Hom.: 73 AF XY: 0.0198 AC XY: 2564AN XY: 129762
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4779
AN:
237902
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2564
AN XY:
129762
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0297 AC: 42958AN: 1447156Hom.: 712 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0289 AC XY: 20818AN XY: 720312
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
42958
AN:
1447156
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
20818
AN XY:
720312
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0216 AC: 3287AN: 152330Hom.: 44 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0211 AC XY: 1573AN XY: 74482
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3287
AN:
152330
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1573
AN XY:
74482
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 06, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15266624) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Anophthalmia-microphthalmia syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at