15-48767476-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):​c.2019-13G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0155 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,443 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 506 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 937 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.749
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 15-48767476-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48767476-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136721.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48767476-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.148 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CEP152NM_001194998.2 linkc.2019-13G>A intron_variant ENST00000380950.7 NP_001181927.1 O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP152ENST00000380950.7 linkc.2019-13G>A intron_variant 1 NM_001194998.2 ENSP00000370337.2 O94986-4
CEP152ENST00000399334.7 linkc.2019-13G>A intron_variant 1 ENSP00000382271.3 O94986-3
CEP152ENST00000325747.9 linkc.1740-13G>A intron_variant 1 ENSP00000321000.5 O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0516
AC:
7846
AN:
152078
Hom.:
504
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.151
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0528
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0871
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0435
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0331
AC:
8256
AN:
249490
Hom.:
465
AF XY:
0.0273
AC XY:
3692
AN XY:
135356
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.100
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00695
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0869
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0170
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0117
AC:
17092
AN:
1461720
Hom.:
937
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0107
AC XY:
7802
AN XY:
727152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0968
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00593
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0963
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0187
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0516
AC:
7854
AN:
152196
Hom.:
506
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0497
AC XY:
3696
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.151
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0529
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0869
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0430
Alfa
AF:
0.0126
Hom.:
120
Bravo
AF:
0.0626
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0570
AC:
201
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 17, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 03, 2025- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
0.067
DANN
Benign
0.62
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9302144; hg19: chr15-49059673; COSMIC: COSV57862651; COSMIC: COSV57862651; API