15-48767476-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.2019-13G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0155 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,443 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 506 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 937 hom. )
Consequence
CEP152
NM_001194998.2 intron
NM_001194998.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.749
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 15-48767476-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48767476-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136721.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48767476-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.148 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP152 | ENST00000380950.7 | c.2019-13G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_001194998.2 | ENSP00000370337.2 | ||||
CEP152 | ENST00000399334.7 | c.2019-13G>A | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000382271.3 | |||||
CEP152 | ENST00000325747.9 | c.1740-13G>A | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000321000.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0516 AC: 7846AN: 152078Hom.: 504 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7846
AN:
152078
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0331 AC: 8256AN: 249490Hom.: 465 AF XY: 0.0273 AC XY: 3692AN XY: 135356
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8256
AN:
249490
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3692
AN XY:
135356
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0117 AC: 17092AN: 1461720Hom.: 937 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0107 AC XY: 7802AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
17092
AN:
1461720
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
7802
AN XY:
727152
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0516 AC: 7854AN: 152196Hom.: 506 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0497 AC XY: 3696AN XY: 74412
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7854
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3696
AN XY:
74412
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
201
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 17, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 03, 2025 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at