15-90811290-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000057.4(BLM):​c.3960C>T​(p.Pro1320Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000898 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1320P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0047 ( 6 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.59

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BLM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bloom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
  • osteosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 15-90811290-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90811290-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136519.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.59 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00467 (711/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0163 (679/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 320 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BLMNM_000057.4 linkc.3960C>T p.Pro1320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 22 ENST00000355112.8 NP_000048.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BLMENST00000355112.8 linkc.3960C>T p.Pro1320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 22 1 NM_000057.4 ENSP00000347232.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00467
AC:
711
AN:
152160
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00114
AC:
286
AN:
251424
AF XY:
0.000942
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000549
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000506
AC:
739
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000426
AC XY:
310
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0184
AC:
617
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000715
AC:
32
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000428
AC:
17
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000520
AC:
3
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000117
AC:
13
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000861
AC:
52
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
45
90
134
179
224
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00467
AC:
711
AN:
152278
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00430
AC XY:
320
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0163
AC:
679
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
19
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
115
153
191
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00256
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00592
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Apr 29, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 06, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BLM c.3960C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. Five computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 277188 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.016 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BLM causing Bloom Syndrome phenotype (0.0035), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3960C>T in individuals affected with Bloom Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Multiple ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant predominantly as likely benign/benign (2) and 1 as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Bloom syndrome Benign:4
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Sep 16, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
2.2
DANN
Benign
0.52
PhyloP100
-1.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56009845; hg19: chr15-91354520; API