15-90970444-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_003981.4(PRC1):āc.1532A>Gā(p.Tyr511Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0675 in 1,613,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,426 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003981.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRC1 | NM_003981.4 | c.1532A>G | p.Tyr511Cys | missense_variant | 12/15 | ENST00000394249.8 | NP_003972.2 | |
PRC1-AS1 | NR_051984.1 | n.310+3766T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRC1 | ENST00000394249.8 | c.1532A>G | p.Tyr511Cys | missense_variant | 12/15 | 1 | NM_003981.4 | ENSP00000377793 | ||
PRC1-AS1 | ENST00000554388.2 | n.339+3766T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0518 AC: 7872AN: 152078Hom.: 296 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0646 AC: 16228AN: 251372Hom.: 807 AF XY: 0.0710 AC XY: 9640AN XY: 135868
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0692 AC: 101055AN: 1460816Hom.: 4133 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0718 AC XY: 52214AN XY: 726746
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0517 AC: 7864AN: 152196Hom.: 293 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0519 AC XY: 3865AN XY: 74410
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Lab, National Institute of Public Health | Feb 01, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at