17-14074320-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001303.4(COX10):c.44-3T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000415 in 1,613,972 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001303.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COX10 | NM_001303.4 | c.44-3T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000261643.8 | NP_001294.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COX10 | ENST00000261643.8 | c.44-3T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001303.4 | ENSP00000261643 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000431 AC: 63AN: 1461774Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000481 AC XY: 35AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74370
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mitochondrial complex IV deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Leigh syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at