17-18122213-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):ā€‹c.3413A>Gā€‹(p.Gln1138Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00654 in 1,613,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 300 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.019 ( 71 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0052 ( 229 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.510
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0018774569).
BP6
Variant 17-18122213-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18122213-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226784.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-18122213-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0995 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3413A>G p.Gln1138Arg missense_variant 2/66 ENST00000647165.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3413A>G p.Gln1138Arg missense_variant 2/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AENST00000583079.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.3046A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0191
AC:
2910
AN:
152182
Hom.:
72
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0485
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00674
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.107
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00868
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0139
AC:
3447
AN:
248824
Hom.:
132
AF XY:
0.0125
AC XY:
1689
AN XY:
135266
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0481
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00549
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00779
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00778
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00523
AC:
7633
AN:
1460848
Hom.:
229
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
0.00508
AC XY:
3690
AN XY:
726714
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0498
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0858
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00546
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00811
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000665
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0109
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0191
AC:
2910
AN:
152300
Hom.:
71
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0192
AC XY:
1433
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0484
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00673
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00869
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00100
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0151
Alfa
AF:
0.00760
Hom.:
46
Bravo
AF:
0.0214
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0425
AC:
173
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000958
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.0141
AC:
1703
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0410
AC:
144
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000763
EpiControl
AF:
0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 17, 2015p.Gln1138Arg in exon 2 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 10.9% (939/8600) of East Asian ch romosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs76468019). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
0.18
DANN
Benign
0.19
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0094
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-2.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.020
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.17
T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0019
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
.;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.020
.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.51
.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.89
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;B
Vest4
0.014
ClinPred
0.0097
T
GERP RS
-3.5
Varity_R
0.029
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs76468019; hg19: chr17-18025527; COSMIC: COSV52753815; API