17-28957176-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_178860.5(SEZ6):āc.2561A>Gā(p.Gln854Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00302 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 136 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178860.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZ6 | NM_178860.5 | c.2561A>G | p.Gln854Arg | missense_variant | 13/17 | ENST00000317338.17 | NP_849191.3 | |
LOC105371716 | XR_001752822.2 | n.1807+3768T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZ6 | ENST00000317338.17 | c.2561A>G | p.Gln854Arg | missense_variant | 13/17 | 1 | NM_178860.5 | ENSP00000312942 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0168 AC: 2560AN: 152192Hom.: 66 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00426 AC: 1061AN: 249184Hom.: 24 AF XY: 0.00305 AC XY: 413AN XY: 135198
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00158 AC: 2313AN: 1461686Hom.: 69 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00139 AC XY: 1014AN XY: 727128
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0168 AC: 2565AN: 152310Hom.: 67 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0158 AC XY: 1173AN XY: 74466
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at