Menu
GeneBe

17-43099786-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.536A>G(p.Tyr179Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000337 in 1,608,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y179F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

5
9
4

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:35

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 17-43099786-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37661.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-43099786-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000336 (489/1455778) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0181 (104/5754). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 256 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.536A>G p.Tyr179Cys missense_variant 7/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.536A>G p.Tyr179Cys missense_variant 7/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000348
AC:
53
AN:
152216
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000258
AC:
65
AN:
251464
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000338
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000336
AC:
489
AN:
1455778
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000353
AC XY:
256
AN XY:
724678
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000901
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000731
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000348
AC:
53
AN:
152334
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000915
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000521
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000400
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000272
AC:
33
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:35
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:12
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000000173 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesMay 03, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 19, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylApr 07, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 01, 2015- -
not specified Benign:10
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchResearch Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of TorontoJan 31, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 22, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 04, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 19, 2022- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 23, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: 6 B/LB, including expert panel -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 16, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 18, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024BRCA1: BP1, BS3:Moderate, BS1 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicAug 01, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 03, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 15, 2014- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsApr 05, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 25, 2020- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Apr 07, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaSep 02, 2015- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 22, 2023- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Tyr179Cys variant has been identified in 11 of 5342 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.002) in individuals with breast or ovarian cancers (Akbari 2011, Augello 2006, Caligo 2008, Diez 2003, Jalkh 2012, Russo 2007, Solano 2012) and was absent in 400 control chromosomes from these studies. Myriad reports this variant as a polymorphism, and Exome Server Project reports a frequency of 0.0003 in European American alleles, and 0.0002 in African American alleles. This variant has been also been reported in dbSNP (ID: rs56187033) “with non-pathogenic allele”, in the BIC database 54X as a variant of unknown clinical importance, and in UMD 27X as a neutral variant which co-occurred with pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 four times (BRCA1 c.2043dup (p.Asn682X), BRCA1 c.191G>A (p.Cys64Tyr), BRCA2 c.6082_6086delGAAGA (p.Glu2028LysfsX19), BRCA2 c.5909C>A (p.Ser1970X)). The p.Tyr179 residue is conserved in mammals; however, computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein, and this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Functional studies on the p.Tyr179Cys variant have suggested that it may have a deleterious effect on BRCA1 function, in assays evaluating its effect in homologous repair (Caligo 2008, Di Cecco 2009), non-homologous end-joining (Guidugli 2011), interaction of BRCA1 with Filamin A (Velkova 2010), and accumulation of BRCA1 at double-strand breaks (Wei 2008). Many studies have identified the p.Tyr179Cys variant co-occurring with two other BRCA1 variants, p.Phe486Lys and p.Asn550His, in individuals with breast or ovarian cancers (Augello 2006, Caligo 2008, Diez 2003, Jalkh 2012), suggesting that together they constitute a rare haplotype (Tavtigian 2006). Furthermore, Augello (2006) identified these three mutations in three members of one family indicating that they exist in cis, and suggests that the presence of the three variants might produce an effect on the conformation of the protein and, consequently, on its function. In summary, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.31
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.52
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.49
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.88
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.62
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;M;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.89
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.65
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.47
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.75
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.085
T;D;D;T;D;T;.;.;T;.;D;.;D;.;D;.
Polyphen
1.0, 1.0
.;D;.;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.72
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.47
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.30
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56187033; hg19: chr17-41251803; COSMIC: COSV58790895; COSMIC: COSV58790895; API