Menu
GeneBe

17-43115763-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM1PM2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.97G>C​(p.Glu33Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E33D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

3
12
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 8 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_007294.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.97G>C p.Glu33Gln missense_variant 3/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.97G>C p.Glu33Gln missense_variant 3/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
30
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 21, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with glutamine at codon 33 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 functions in a haploid cell proliferation assay and in a E3 ligase and a yeast two-hybrid BARD1 binding assays (PMID: 25823446, 30209399). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity of 1.0673 and 0.5995 based on co-occurrence and family history, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 28, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification providedin vitroBrotman Baty Institute, University of Washington-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Nov 25, 2004- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 04, 2022Variant summary: BRCA1 c.97G>C (p.Glu33Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Zinc finger, RING-type domain (IPR001841) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250748 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.97G>C has been reported in the literature in a patient cohort referred to testing for Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (Judkins_2005). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in our lab (CHEK2 c.1283C>T, p.Ser428Phe), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Two independent publications report experimental evidence evaluating the impact of the variant on protein function: Starita_2015 classified the variant as VUS after assaying for E3 ligase activity and BARD1 binding affinity, and Findlay_2018 classified the variant as functional after employing a haploid cell survival assay. Three ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: all laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchJan 22, 2014- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 22, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Identified in patients referred for BRCA1/2 testing (Judkins et al., 2005); Also known as 216G>C; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21147198, 10923033, 8944023, 16267036, 20104584, 24389207, 30209399) -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Glu33Gln variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, UMD-LSDB, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80357066) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (as uncertain significance by BIC, COGR, GeneDx, and Invitae), Clinvitae (3x as uncertain signifiance), and BIC Database (1x as "unknown"). The variant was not identified in the following control databases: the 1000 Genomes Project, the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017).. The p.Glu33Gln residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 15, 2022In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on BRCA1 function (PMID: 25823446, 30209399). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 30209399) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA1 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 55769). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 33 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Glu33Gln). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.57
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.26
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.14
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.56
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.64
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.64
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.37
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.53
N;N;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.68
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.42
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.56
Sift
Uncertain
0.015
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.051
T;D;D;T;T;.;D;.;D;.;D;.;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.61
MutPred
0.65
Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);Gain of catalytic residue at E33 (P = 0.0503);
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
0.77
D
GERP RS
6.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.6
Varity_R
0.56
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80357066; hg19: chr17-41267780; API