17-80105033-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.447G>A(p.Thr149=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00529 in 1,612,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0040 ( 7 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0054 ( 40 hom. )
Consequence
GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous
NM_000152.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.40
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 17-80105033-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80105033-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129121.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-80105033-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-80105033-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.39 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00395 (602/152246) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0334 (173/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0294. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 286 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.447G>A | p.Thr149= | synonymous_variant | 2/20 | ENST00000302262.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.447G>A | p.Thr149= | synonymous_variant | 2/20 | 1 | NM_000152.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00395 AC: 601AN: 152128Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
601
AN:
152128
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00509 AC: 1257AN: 246846Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00501 AC XY: 674AN XY: 134562
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1257
AN:
246846
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
674
AN XY:
134562
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00542 AC: 7923AN: 1460602Hom.: 40 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00545 AC XY: 3957AN XY: 726620
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7923
AN:
1460602
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
3957
AN XY:
726620
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00395 AC: 602AN: 152246Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00384 AC XY: 286AN XY: 74434
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
602
AN:
152246
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
286
AN XY:
74434
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
73
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 25, 2018 | Variant summary: The GAA c.447G>A (p.Thr149Thr) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change that is not located in any known domain (InterPro). One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 1372/272790 control chromosomes (12 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0050295, which is approximately equal to the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic GAA variant (0.0042205), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 19, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 14, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 06, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 21, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Jan 22, 2020 | The c.447G>A (p.Thr149=) variant in GAA has been reported in one individual with Glycogen Storage Disease Type II (PMID: 18458862). This variant has been reported as a benign variant (by UChicago Genetics Services Laboratory, GeneDx, Invitae, EGL, and PreventionGenetics) and a VUS (by Illumina) in ClinVar (Variation ID: 129121). This variant has been identified in 2.97% (590/19862) of East Asian chromosomes and 13 homozygotes as well as other populations at lesser frequencies by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs2289536). This variant has been seen in the general population at a frequency high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools, including splice predictors, and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for Glycogen Storage Disease II in an autosomal recessive manner based on its frequency in the general population. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BP7, BP4 (Richards 2015). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 10, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at