17-80107908-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.955+12G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.709 in 1,594,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 403,769 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.66 ( 33494 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.71 ( 370275 hom. )
Consequence
GAA
NM_000152.5 intron
NM_000152.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.701
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BP6
Variant 17-80107908-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80107908-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92491.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-80107908-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.731 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.955+12G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000302262.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.955+12G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000152.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.655 AC: 99600AN: 151956Hom.: 33481 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
99600
AN:
151956
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.695 AC: 150388AN: 216458Hom.: 52770 AF XY: 0.706 AC XY: 83917AN XY: 118798
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
150388
AN:
216458
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
83917
AN XY:
118798
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.714 AC: 1030860AN: 1442818Hom.: 370275 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.716 AC XY: 512901AN XY: 716836
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1030860
AN:
1442818
Hom.:
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
AC XY:
512901
AN XY:
716836
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.655 AC: 99644AN: 152074Hom.: 33494 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.653 AC XY: 48558AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
99644
AN:
152074
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
48558
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2043
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 04, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | multiple AR variants in same gene - keep for nowAllele frequency is common in at least one population database (frequency: 82.703% in ExAC) based on the frequency threshold of 2.76% for this gene.Variant was observed in a homozygous state in population databases more than expected for disease.5 reputable source/s reports the variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.A synonymous variant not located in a splice region. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 19, 2015 | - - |
Glycogen storage disease, type II Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at