18-23568899-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000271.5(NPC1):ā€‹c.387T>Cā€‹(p.Tyr129=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.154 in 1,613,482 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,628 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.13 ( 1617 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.16 ( 19011 hom. )

Consequence

NPC1
NM_000271.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0660
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPC1 (HGNC:7897): (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1) This gene encodes a large protein that resides in the limiting membrane of endosomes and lysosomes and mediates intracellular cholesterol trafficking via binding of cholesterol to its N-terminal domain. It is predicted to have a cytoplasmic C-terminus, 13 transmembrane domains, and 3 large loops in the lumen of the endosome - the last loop being at the N-terminus. This protein transports low-density lipoproteins to late endosomal/lysosomal compartments where they are hydrolized and released as free cholesterol. Defects in this gene cause Niemann-Pick type C disease, a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by over accumulation of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 18-23568899-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-23568899-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129811.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr18-23568899-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.066 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.18 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NPC1NM_000271.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.387T>C p.Tyr129= synonymous_variant 4/25 ENST00000269228.10 NP_000262.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPC1ENST00000269228.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.387T>C p.Tyr129= synonymous_variant 4/251 NM_000271.5 ENSP00000269228 P1O15118-1
NPC1ENST00000540608.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.301T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/162

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.133
AC:
20273
AN:
152138
Hom.:
1619
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0677
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.247
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.277
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.132
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.294
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.168
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.166
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.144
AC:
36100
AN:
251370
Hom.:
3192
AF XY:
0.152
AC XY:
20638
AN XY:
135856
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0666
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0926
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0157
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.187
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.138
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.167
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.174
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.156
AC:
227543
AN:
1461226
Hom.:
19011
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.158
AC XY:
114914
AN XY:
726988
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0664
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0984
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.272
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0128
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.183
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.161
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.162
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.133
AC:
20266
AN:
152256
Hom.:
1617
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.134
AC XY:
10003
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0678
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.277
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.190
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.168
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.164
Alfa
AF:
0.167
Hom.:
3825
Bravo
AF:
0.128
Asia WGS
AF:
0.105
AC:
367
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.182
EpiControl
AF:
0.180

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 24, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJan 06, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 23, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Benign
0.36
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12970899; hg19: chr18-21148863; API