18-31598602-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_000371.4(TTR):c.371G>A(p.Arg124His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000198 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000371.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTR | NM_000371.4 | c.371G>A | p.Arg124His | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000237014.8 | NP_000362.1 | |
LOC124904277 | XR_007066326.1 | n.129-2907C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTR | ENST00000237014.8 | c.371G>A | p.Arg124His | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_000371.4 | ENSP00000237014.4 | ||
TTR | ENST00000649620.1 | c.371G>A | p.Arg124His | missense_variant | 6/6 | ENSP00000497927.1 | ||||
TTR | ENST00000610404.5 | c.275G>A | p.Arg92His | missense_variant | 4/4 | 5 | ENSP00000477599.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000322 AC: 49AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000792 AC: 199AN: 251350Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000736 AC XY: 100AN XY: 135838
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000186 AC: 272AN: 1461860Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000191 AC XY: 139AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000315 AC: 48AN: 152268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10529370, 15820680, 10772944, 16911959) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 10, 2016 | Variant Summary: The TTR variant, c.371G>A (p.Arg124His) causes a missense change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 2/4 in silico tools (SNPs&Go and mutation taster not captured here due to low reliability index and p-value, respectively) predicting a "benign" outcome. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 79/121336 (1/1535 including 1 homozygote), predominantly in the Asian cohort, 79/25158 (1/322), which significantly exceeds the estimated expected allele frequency for a pathogenic TTR variant of 1/31948. Therefore, suggesting the variant is a common polymorphism found in population(s) of Asian origin. The variant of interest has been reported in affected individuals via multiple publications suggesting a benign nature for the variant or even a suppressive impact. A Japanese patient who was compound heterozygote expressing both R104H and V30M alleles did not exhibit the typical V30M FAP pathology displayed by V30M/WT heterozygotes. He exhibited increased levels of TTR and holo-RBP in serum relative to V30M/WT heterozygotes, suggesting that R104H suppresses V30M aggregation in vivo (Terazaki_1999). However, R104H compound heterozygotes expressing the aggressive mutation T59K from the second TTR allele presented with FAP pathology analogous to that characteristic of WT/T59K heterozygotes, suggesting that R104H may only suppress pathology in compound heterozygotes expressing mildly destabilizing TTR variants (Lim_2002). In vitro studies also support a benign or suppressor impact by the variant. Denaturation of TTR in V30M/R104H patient serum demonstrated that the R104H-containing tetramers were more resistant, suggesting that the R104H variant may stabilize the quaternary structure of TTR (Almeida_2000). These observations imply that the incorporation of R104H into heterotetramers comprised of an FAP-associated variant may stabilize the TTR structure, effectively preventing aggregation in vivo. In addition, authors suggest the variant of interest to act in a protective manner when as a complex allele with a mild TTR variant. In addition, multiple internal LCA samples report the variant to co-occur with other potentially pathogenic variants, MYH7 c.1273G>A (classified as likely pathgoenic ) and 2 reported with TTR variant, c.236C>A (p.Thr79Lys - classified as likely pathgoenic ). Multiple databases/clinical laboratories cite the variant with conflicting classifications, "pathogenic" or "benign." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Likely Benign. - |
Amyloidosis, hereditary systemic 1 Pathogenic:1Benign:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Oct 22, 1999 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 20, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 19, 2013 | Arg124His in exon 4 of TTR: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it is found in several other species including mammals and has b een identified in 2% (8/394) Chinese chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (ht tp://www.1000genomes.org; dbSNP rs121918095). Arg124His in exon 4 of TTR (rs121 918095; allele frequency = 2%, 8/394) - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 28, 2017 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 26, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at