18-59267642-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_013435.3(RAX):​c.*1362G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00876 in 148,338 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0088 ( 41 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

RAX
NM_013435.3 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.361
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAX (HGNC:18662): (retina and anterior neural fold homeobox) This gene encodes a homeobox-containing transcription factor that functions in eye development. The gene is expressed early in the eye primordia, and is required for retinal cell fate determination and also regulates stem cell proliferation. Mutations in this gene have been reported in patients with defects in ocular development, including microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00876 (1300/148338) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0131 (868/66440). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0123. There are 41 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 652 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 41 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RAXNM_013435.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1362G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 3/3 ENST00000334889.4 NP_038463.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAXENST00000334889.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1362G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 3/31 NM_013435.3 ENSP00000334813 P1Q9Y2V3-1
RAXENST00000256852.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1834G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant 2/21 ENSP00000256852 Q9Y2V3-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00877
AC:
1300
AN:
148234
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00827
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00795
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000465
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00502
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSR
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
62
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
50
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00876
AC:
1300
AN:
148338
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00901
AC XY:
652
AN XY:
72370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00826
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00795
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000466
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0169
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00496
Alfa
AF:
0.00854
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00730

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Isolated microphthalmia 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.31
DANN
Benign
0.35

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs549738316; hg19: chr18-56934874; API