18-72756115-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_138966.5(NETO1):c.901A>G(p.Ser301Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
NETO1
NM_138966.5 missense
NM_138966.5 missense
Scores
5
9
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 8.02
Genes affected
NETO1 (HGNC:13823): (neuropilin and tolloid like 1) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein containing two extracellular CUB domains followed by a low-density lipoprotein class A (LDLa) domain. This protein is thought to play a critical role in spatial learning and memory by regulating the function of synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor complexes in the hippocampus. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.82
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 27
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
27
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genomics Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis | Oct 23, 2024 | The NETO1 c.901A>G (p.Ser301Gly) variant, to our knowledge, has not been reported in the medical literature and is absent from the general population (gnomAD v.2.1.1), indicating it is not a common variant. Computational predictors indicate that the variant is damaging, evidence that correlates with impact on NETO1 function. Due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Benign
.;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
P;P
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);Loss of sheet (P = 0.1907);
MVP
MPC
1.4
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.