18-74631113-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_017757.3(ZNF407):c.94G>T(p.Asp32Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,584 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D32D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017757.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNF407 | NM_017757.3 | c.94G>T | p.Asp32Tyr | missense_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000299687.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNF407 | ENST00000299687.10 | c.94G>T | p.Asp32Tyr | missense_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_017757.3 | P2 | |
ZNF407 | ENST00000577538.5 | c.94G>T | p.Asp32Tyr | missense_variant | 1/7 | 2 | A2 | ||
ZNF407 | ENST00000309902.10 | c.94G>T | p.Asp32Tyr | missense_variant | 1/4 | 2 | |||
ZNF407 | ENST00000582337.5 | c.94G>T | p.Asp32Tyr | missense_variant | 2/5 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000402 AC: 1AN: 249052Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000740 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135126
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461584Hom.: 0 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727066
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 18, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at