19-1206352-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.-562G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000705 in 231,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
STK11
NM_000455.5 5_prime_UTR
NM_000455.5 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0390
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 19-1206352-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1206352-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 328210.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000158 (24/151860) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00468 (24/5126). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00323. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 24 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.-562G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | ||
STK11 | NM_001407255.1 | c.-562G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/9 | |||
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.575G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.-562G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | P1 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000585465.3 | c.-562G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/10 | 5 | ||||
STK11 | ENST00000652231.1 | c.-562G>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/9 | |||||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.-82-12065G>C | intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 151752Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
151752
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00175 AC: 139AN: 79432Hom.: 1 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 61AN XY: 36614
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
139
AN:
79432
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
36614
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 151860Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74222
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
151860
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74222
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at