19-1226539-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.1194G>A(p.Ala398Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000153 in 1,605,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous
NM_000455.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.806
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 19-1226539-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1226539-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135916.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-1226539-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.806 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000217 (33/152360) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000412 (28/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000292. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 33 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.1194G>A | p.Ala398Ala | synonymous_variant | 9/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.2461G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.1194G>A | p.Ala398Ala | synonymous_variant | 9/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.822G>A | p.Ala274Ala | synonymous_variant | 11/12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152242Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 54AN: 227714Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000271 AC XY: 34AN XY: 125232
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
54
AN:
227714
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
125232
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000146 AC: 212AN: 1452848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000173 AC XY: 125AN XY: 722042
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
212
AN:
1452848
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
722042
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152360Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152360
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74500
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 09, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | STK11: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 01, 2016 | Variant summary: The STK11 c.1194G>A (p.Ala398Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant, and 5/5 splicing algorithms predict no significant change to normal splicing. This variant was found in 22/67290 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003269, which is approximately 52 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic STK11 variant (0.0000063), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as Benign/Likely Benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together and based on the synonymous nature of this variant and the high allele frequency in the general population, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 04, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 16, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 30, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The STK11 p.Ala398= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database or Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs184271025) as “With Likely benign allele” and ClinVar (2x as benign by GeneDx, Integrated Genetics and 3x as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Color Genomics). The variant was identified in control databases in 74 of 255414 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the “Other” population in 4 of 6024 chromosomes (freq: 0.00066), Latino in 18 of 33034 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 45 of 115132 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), and Finnish in 7 of 23466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003); it was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian or South Asian populations. The p.Ala398= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome;C0235974:Carcinoma of pancreas;C1336708:Germ cell tumor of testis;C1835047:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 21, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at