Menu
GeneBe

19-12806658-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):c.-16T>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0418 in 1,572,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,663 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 102 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.043 ( 1561 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.957
Variant links:
Genes affected
RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)
HOOK2 (HGNC:19885): (hook microtubule tethering protein 2) Hook proteins are cytosolic coiled-coil proteins that contain conserved N-terminal domains, which attach to microtubules, and more divergent C-terminal domains, which mediate binding to organelles. The Drosophila Hook protein is a component of the endocytic compartment.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2004]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 19-12806658-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12806658-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 328288.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-12806658-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0312 (4745/152242) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.048 (3266/67998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0467. There are 102 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2275 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 102 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RNASEH2ANM_006397.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.-16T>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/8 ENST00000221486.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RNASEH2AENST00000221486.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.-16T>C 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/81 NM_006397.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0312
AC:
4745
AN:
152122
Hom.:
102
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0366
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0623
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0480
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0206
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0290
AC:
5346
AN:
184630
Hom.:
130
AF XY:
0.0284
AC XY:
2821
AN XY:
99380
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00718
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0365
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00800
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0437
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0430
AC:
61036
AN:
1420378
Hom.:
1561
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0421
AC XY:
29565
AN XY:
703008
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0364
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000268
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00757
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0605
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0492
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0312
AC:
4745
AN:
152242
Hom.:
102
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0306
AC XY:
2275
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00833
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0366
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00539
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0623
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0480
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0204
Alfa
AF:
0.0394
Hom.:
30
Bravo
AF:
0.0272
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00433
AC:
15
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 07, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
Cadd
Benign
3.0
Dann
Benign
0.67
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1046220; hg19: chr19-12917472; API