19-12897357-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000159.4(GCDH):āc.1011A>Gā(p.Ala337Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00109 in 1,613,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0014 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0011 ( 19 hom. )
Consequence
GCDH
NM_000159.4 synonymous
NM_000159.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.35
Genes affected
GCDH (HGNC:4189): (glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family. It catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and CO(2) in the degradative pathway of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine, and L-tryptophan metabolism. It uses electron transfer flavoprotein as its electron acceptor. The enzyme exists in the mitochondrial matrix as a homotetramer of 45-kD subunits. Mutations in this gene result in the metabolic disorder glutaric aciduria type 1, which is also known as glutaric acidemia type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 12. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 19-12897357-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12897357-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 193562.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-12897357-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-12897357-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.35 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00136 (207/152216) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0335 (173/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0294. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 98 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | NM_000159.4 | c.1011A>G | p.Ala337Ala | synonymous_variant | 10/12 | ENST00000222214.10 | NP_000150.1 | |
GCDH | NM_013976.5 | c.1011A>G | p.Ala337Ala | synonymous_variant | 10/12 | NP_039663.1 | ||
GCDH | NR_102316.1 | n.1174A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/12 | ||||
GCDH | NR_102317.1 | n.1392A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | ENST00000222214.10 | c.1011A>G | p.Ala337Ala | synonymous_variant | 10/12 | 1 | NM_000159.4 | ENSP00000222214.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00135 AC: 205AN: 152098Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
205
AN:
152098
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00268 AC: 674AN: 251180Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 353AN XY: 135854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
674
AN:
251180
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
353
AN XY:
135854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00106 AC: 1544AN: 1461568Hom.: 19 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00110 AC XY: 801AN XY: 727102
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1544
AN:
1461568
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
801
AN XY:
727102
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152216Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 98AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
98
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Glutaric aciduria, type 1 Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 12, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 20, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1011A>G (p.Ala337=) in GCDH gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect a normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting these predictions were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the large control population dataset of ExAC at a frequency 0.0026 (318/120126 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of East Asian origin (0.033; 284/8608 chrs tested, including 5 homozygotes). The latter frequency exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic variant (0.0035). The variant is present in a control population dataset of gmomAD predominantly in individuals of East Asian origin: 0.032 (610/ 18932 chrs, including 5 homozygotes); however, since the data set is still in beta mode, this data was not captured in pbGP. The c. 1011A>G has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via published reports, but is cited as Benign by a reputable database/clinical laboratory. The variant seems to be an ethnic specific polymorphism, therefore it has been classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 02, 2018 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 28, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at