19-40396417-G-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_181882.3(PRX):c.1935C>A(p.Pro645Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P645P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
PRX
NM_181882.3 synonymous
NM_181882.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.73
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
PRX (HGNC:13797): (periaxin) This gene encodes a protein involved in peripheral nerve myelin upkeep. The encoded protein contains 2 PDZ domains which were named after PSD95 (post synaptic density protein), DlgA (Drosophila disc large tumor suppressor), and ZO1 (a mammalian tight junction protein). Two alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene which encode different protein isoforms and which are targeted differently in the Schwann cell. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuoropathy, type 4F and Dejerine-Sottas neuropathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PRX Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4FInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 3Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.73 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRX | NM_181882.3 | c.1935C>A | p.Pro645Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | ENST00000324001.8 | NP_870998.2 | |
| PRX | NM_001411127.1 | c.2220C>A | p.Pro740Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | NP_001398056.1 | ||
| PRX | XM_017027047.2 | c.1833C>A | p.Pro611Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | XP_016882536.1 | ||
| PRX | NM_020956.2 | c.*2140C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | NP_066007.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRX | ENST00000324001.8 | c.1935C>A | p.Pro645Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | 1 | NM_181882.3 | ENSP00000326018.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000282 AC: 4AN: 142050Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
142050
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 6.87e-7 AC: 1AN: 1455400Hom.: 0 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 724242 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1455400
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
724242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
33144
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
44392
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
25754
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39446
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
86164
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53286
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5722
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1107664
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
59828
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.0000281 AC: 4AN: 142192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000432 AC XY: 3AN XY: 69480 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
142192
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
69480
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
38094
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
14358
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3352
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4520
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4308
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
9648
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
202
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
64910
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
1940
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.225
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.