19-45353112-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_Moderate

The NM_000400.4(ERCC2):​c.1802G>A​(p.Arg601Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000316 in 1,613,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R601L) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC2
NM_000400.4 missense

Scores

14
4
1

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.56
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.

PM1
In a region_of_interest Mediates interaction with MMS19 (size 199) in uniprot entity ERCC2_HUMAN there are 13 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (87%) in NM_000400.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chrnull-null-null-null is described in UniProt as null.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.866

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC2NM_000400.4 linkc.1802G>A p.Arg601Gln missense_variant Exon 19 of 23 ENST00000391945.10 NP_000391.1 P18074-1
ERCC2XM_011526611.3 linkc.1724G>A p.Arg575Gln missense_variant Exon 18 of 22 XP_011524913.1
ERCC2XR_001753633.3 linkn.1835G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 19 of 24
ERCC2XR_007066680.1 linkn.1757G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 18 of 23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC2ENST00000391945.10 linkc.1802G>A p.Arg601Gln missense_variant Exon 19 of 23 1 NM_000400.4 ENSP00000375809.4 P18074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000270
AC:
41
AN:
152002
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000515
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000187
AC:
47
AN:
250910
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000169
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135728
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000320
AC:
468
AN:
1461288
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000304
AC XY:
221
AN XY:
726950
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000564
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000398
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000270
AC:
41
AN:
152002
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000243
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000515
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000326
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000212
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000173
AC:
21
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 20, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 601 of the ERCC2 protein (p.Arg601Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs140522180, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERCC2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 134097). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt ERCC2 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects ERCC2 function (PMID: 27504877). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Nov 22, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Has been reported in multiple unrelated individuals with breast/ovarian or renal cancer; however this variant was also observed in control populations (Rump et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2021); Published functional studies of this variant identified in breast cancer samples demonstrate a damaging effect (Rump et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27504877, 27085493, 32830346) -

Xeroderma pigmentosum Uncertain:1
Mar 17, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D Uncertain:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Neoplasm Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: -
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
1.0
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.12
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.25
CADD
Pathogenic
33
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.80
D;D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.92
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
1.0
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.52
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.87
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.78
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
4.3
H;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.8
D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.67
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.
Vest4
0.92
MVP
0.89
MPC
0.72
ClinPred
0.98
D
GERP RS
5.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Varity_R
0.93
gMVP
0.84

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140522180; hg19: chr19-45856370; API