19-45364001-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000400.4(ERCC2):​c.934G>A​(p.Asp312Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.319 in 1,543,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 83,473 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.26 ( 6406 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.33 ( 77067 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC2
NM_000400.4 missense

Scores

1
4
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.64
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0015462935).
BP6
Variant 19-45364001-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-45364001-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 134117.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-45364001-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.348 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC2NM_000400.4 linkc.934G>A p.Asp312Asn missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 ENST00000391945.10 NP_000391.1 P18074-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC2ENST00000391945.10 linkc.934G>A p.Asp312Asn missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 NM_000400.4 ENSP00000375809.4 P18074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.265
AC:
40248
AN:
152048
Hom.:
6409
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.513
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.352
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0468
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.341
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.370
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.373
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.351
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.273
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.290
AC:
41034
AN:
141480
Hom.:
6833
AF XY:
0.301
AC XY:
23207
AN XY:
77124
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.195
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0431
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.350
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.369
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.354
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.321
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.325
AC:
452603
AN:
1391460
Hom.:
77067
Cov.:
54
AF XY:
0.328
AC XY:
225055
AN XY:
686616
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.198
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.356
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0399
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.350
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.366
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.342
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.302
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.264
AC:
40240
AN:
152166
Hom.:
6406
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.264
AC XY:
19676
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.229
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.352
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0467
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.342
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.370
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.351
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.269
Alfa
AF:
0.315
Hom.:
4031
Bravo
AF:
0.243
TwinsUK
AF:
0.361
AC:
1338
ALSPAC
AF:
0.339
AC:
1307
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0976
AC:
387
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.317
AC:
2507
ExAC
AF:
0.213
AC:
21786
Asia WGS
AF:
0.168
AC:
589
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency, variant associated with cancer risk -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 03, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D Benign:4
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Sep 18, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27306318, 24841663, 25916209, 24101192, 24933002, 23973729, 29989875, 27153395, 24868140, 11606376, 19041121, 24728327, 21245954, 19242824, 21643959, 19669592, 19055600, 18641418, 22184993, 14630517, 20070155, 19706757) -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 2 Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive Benign:1
Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.49
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.066
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0015
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.78
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;D;.;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.053
B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.23
MPC
0.28
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.59
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799793; hg19: chr19-45867259; COSMIC: COSV55538614; COSMIC: COSV55538614; API