2-202035234-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_003507.2(FZD7):c.587G>A(p.Gly196Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00967 in 1,600,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZD7 | NM_003507.2 | c.587G>A | p.Gly196Glu | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000286201.3 | NP_003498.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZD7 | ENST00000286201.3 | c.587G>A | p.Gly196Glu | missense_variant | 1/1 | 6 | NM_003507.2 | ENSP00000286201.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00690 AC: 1050AN: 152248Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00751 AC: 1737AN: 231432Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.00792 AC XY: 1012AN XY: 127790
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00996 AC: 14425AN: 1448442Hom.: 87 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00990 AC XY: 7140AN XY: 721070
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00694 AC: 1058AN: 152366Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00651 AC XY: 485AN XY: 74518
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at