2-214767503-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BS2_Supporting
The ENST00000260947.9(BARD1):āc.1547A>Gā(p.Tyr516Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,640 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y516H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000260947.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | NM_000465.4 | c.1547A>G | p.Tyr516Cys | missense_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000260947.9 | NP_000456.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | ENST00000260947.9 | c.1547A>G | p.Tyr516Cys | missense_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_000465.4 | ENSP00000260947 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1461470Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727058
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 28, 2023 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The cysteine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 406731). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BARD1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 516 of the BARD1 protein (p.Tyr516Cys). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 23, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 04, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 02, 2022 | The p.Y516C variant (also known as c.1547A>G), located in coding exon 6 of the BARD1 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1547. The tyrosine at codon 516 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at