chr2-214767503-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BS2_Supporting

The ENST00000260947.9(BARD1):ā€‹c.1547A>Gā€‹(p.Tyr516Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,613,640 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y516H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
ENST00000260947.9 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.996
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.27904).
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1547A>G p.Tyr516Cys missense_variant 6/11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1547A>G p.Tyr516Cys missense_variant 6/111 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947 P2Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000411
AC:
6
AN:
1461470
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00000688
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
727058
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74342
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsJan 19, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpAug 28, 2023In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The cysteine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 406731). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BARD1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 516 of the BARD1 protein (p.Tyr516Cys). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 23, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 04, 2018- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 02, 2022The p.Y516C variant (also known as c.1547A>G), located in coding exon 6 of the BARD1 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1547. The tyrosine at codon 516 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.055
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.13
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.68
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.74
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.015
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.28
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.95
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.6
D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.20
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.072
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.18
MutPred
0.66
Loss of methylation at R520 (P = 0.1453);.;
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.095
ClinPred
0.15
T
GERP RS
-1.3
Varity_R
0.51
gMVP
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs876660325; hg19: chr2-215632227; API