2-214780858-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.1016G>A​(p.Ser339Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000167 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:11B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.110
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.061111897).
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 25 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkc.1016G>A p.Ser339Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2 Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkc.1016G>A p.Ser339Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 1 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947.4 Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251180
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135784
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000171
AC:
25
AN:
1461814
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000193
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
727200
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000989
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152290
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:11Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Jun 13, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Published functional studies suggest no damaging effect: HDR activity was slightly less than, yet comparable to, wildtype (PMID: 30925164); Observed in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 30925164, 31371347); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31371347, 27363283, 33471991, 30925164) -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jul 05, 2022
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3
Mar 07, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 339 of the BARD1 protein (p.Ser339Asn). This variant is present in population databases (rs201261729, gnomAD 0.002%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 31371347). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182043). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The asparagine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BARD1 function (PMID: 30925164). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Feb 06, 2024
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BARD1 c.1016G>A (p.Ser339Asn) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.003% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function and a homology-directed repair assay supports that this variant is functional (PMID: 30925164). This variant has been reported in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 31371347). In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Oct 19, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 13, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Apr 17, 2023
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces serine with asparagine at codon 339 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has shown the variant protein to be functional in homology-directed repair in a cell-based assay (PMID: 30925164). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31371347). This variant has also been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 3/60466 breast cancer cases and absent in 53461 controls (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 3/251180 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified Uncertain:2
Feb 20, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BARD1 c.1016G>A (p.Ser339Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251180 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1016G>A has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with breast cancer without strong evidence for causality (Toh_2019). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed similar HDR activity compared to wild-type (Adamovich_2019). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Five submitters classified the variant as VUS while one classified as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Dec 02, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
7.4
DANN
Benign
0.68
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.34
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.55
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.061
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.38
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.099
Sift
Benign
0.55
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.36
T;T
Polyphen
0.049
B;.
Vest4
0.087
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.073
ClinPred
0.055
T
GERP RS
2.9
Varity_R
0.034
gMVP
0.34

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201261729; hg19: chr2-215645582; API