2-214809473-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):ā€‹c.97G>Cā€‹(p.Ala33Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000578 in 1,610,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000060 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.379
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15040433).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkc.97G>C p.Ala33Pro missense_variant 1/11 ENST00000260947.9 NP_000456.2 Q99728-1A0AVN2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkc.97G>C p.Ala33Pro missense_variant 1/111 NM_000465.4 ENSP00000260947.4 Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000295
AC:
7
AN:
237324
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000383
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
130702
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000564
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000604
AC:
88
AN:
1457938
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
76
AF XY:
0.0000607
AC XY:
44
AN XY:
725236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000868
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000340
ExAC
AF:
0.0000166
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsNov 29, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 33 of the BARD1 protein (p.Ala33Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs587782465, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with ovarian cancer (PMID: 26315354). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142436). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The proline amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 11-06-2019 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Jul 18, 2024This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 20, 2023The BARD1 c.97G>C (p.Ala33Pro) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with ovarian cancer (PMID: 26315354 (2015)) and in a cohort of individuals with suspected hereditary cancer syndromes (PMID: 34326862 (2021)). In a large case-control study, this variant has also been detected in individuals with breast cancer as well as in unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BARD1)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000066 (8/121864 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 02, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with epithelial ovarian cancer (Ramus et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18480049, 26315354) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 10, 2022This missense variant replaces alanine with proline at codon 33 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in two individuals affected with ovarian cancer (PMID: 26315354). This variant has been identified in 9/268688 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 27, 2023The p.A33P variant (also known as c.97G>C), located in coding exon 1 of the BARD1 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 97. The alanine at codon 33 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been previously reported in 2/3236 individuals with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (Ramus SJ et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov;107). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 08, 2022Variant summary: BARD1 c.97G>C (p.Ala33Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.9e-05 in 237324 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.97G>C has been reported in the literature as a non-deleterious variant in settings of multigene panel testing of BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN in at-least two individuals affected with serous ovarian cancer (example, Ramus_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.090
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.066
T;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.50
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.55
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.080
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T;T;T;T;.
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.15
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;.;L;.;.;L;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.65
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.87
N;.;.;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.;.;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T;T;D;D;T;D
Polyphen
0.74
P;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.16
MVP
0.92
MPC
0.098
ClinPred
0.21
T
GERP RS
1.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.54
gMVP
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782465; hg19: chr2-215674197; API