2-214809480-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.90T>A​(p.Gly30=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,609,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G30G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00082 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000073 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 synonymous

Scores

1
6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.771
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008374006).
BP6
Variant 2-214809480-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214809480-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 182030.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.771 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000821 (125/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00296 (123/41544). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00254. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 56 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 125 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.90T>A p.Gly30= synonymous_variant 1/11 ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.90T>A p.Gly30= synonymous_variant 1/111 NM_000465.4 P2Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000795
AC:
121
AN:
152124
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00287
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000148
AC:
35
AN:
236354
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000998
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
130222
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000734
AC:
107
AN:
1457326
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
76
AF XY:
0.0000621
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
724894
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000449
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000821
AC:
125
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000752
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000569
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000812
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00241
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000158
AC:
19

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 28, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 02, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 07, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 07, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 21, 2019- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 09, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2016Variant summary: The c.90T>A (p.Gly30=) in BARD1 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.00016 (16/98040 chrs tested), exclusively in individuals of African origin (0.0025; 16/6376 control chrs). This frequency exceeds the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.000125) in this gene. The variant of interest was cited as Benign/Likely Benign by multiple reputable clinical laboratories. Taking together, the variant was classified as Benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
BARD1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 29, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.76
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
1.5
DANN
Benign
0.61
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.018
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0084
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Vest4
0.22
MVP
0.85
GERP RS
-8.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150354152; hg19: chr2-215674204; API