2-218663143-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001079866.2(BCS1L):āc.1017T>Cā(p.Pro339=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0601 in 1,614,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,930 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.15 ( 3979 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.050 ( 4951 hom. )
Consequence
BCS1L
NM_001079866.2 synonymous
NM_001079866.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.129
Genes affected
BCS1L (HGNC:1020): (BCS1 homolog, ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex chaperone) This gene encodes a homolog of the S. cerevisiae bcs1 protein which is involved in the assembly of complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The encoded protein does not contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence but experimental studies confirm that it is imported into mitochondria. Mutations in this gene are associated with mitochondrial complex III deficiency and the GRACILE syndrome. Several alternatively spliced transcripts encoding two different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 2-218663143-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-218663143-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136505.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.129 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.424 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS1L | NM_001079866.2 | c.1017T>C | p.Pro339= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000359273.8 | NP_001073335.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS1L | ENST00000359273.8 | c.1017T>C | p.Pro339= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_001079866.2 | ENSP00000352219 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.152 AC: 23109AN: 152092Hom.: 3958 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23109
AN:
152092
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0717 AC: 18033AN: 251388Hom.: 1820 AF XY: 0.0645 AC XY: 8769AN XY: 135892
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
18033
AN:
251388
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8769
AN XY:
135892
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0505 AC: 73763AN: 1461886Hom.: 4951 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0495 AC XY: 36014AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
73763
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
36014
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.152 AC: 23191AN: 152210Hom.: 3979 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.148 AC XY: 11000AN XY: 74430
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23191
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
11000
AN XY:
74430
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
333
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
GRACILE syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 21, 2016 | p.Pro339Pro in exon 9 of BCS1L: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 50.45% (667/1322) of African chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 3; dbSNP rs35843327). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 18, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Mitochondrial complex III deficiency nuclear type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Pili torti-deafness syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 10, 2021 | - - |
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at