2-27087015-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006488.3(KHK):c.-245G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00938 in 424,554 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0077 ( 8 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 34 hom. )
Consequence
KHK
NM_006488.3 5_prime_UTR
NM_006488.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.743
Genes affected
KHK (HGNC:6315): (ketohexokinase) This gene encodes ketohexokinase that catalyzes conversion of fructose to fructose-1-phosphate. The product of this gene is the first enzyme with a specialized pathway that catabolizes dietary fructose. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 2-27087015-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-27087015-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 335478.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00773 (1178/152326) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0211 (102/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 620 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KHK | NM_006488.3 | c.-245G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | ENST00000260598.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KHK | ENST00000260598.10 | c.-245G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 2 | NM_006488.3 | P3 | ||
KHK | ENST00000260599.11 | c.-245G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/8 | 1 | A1 | |||
KHK | ENST00000429697.2 | c.-245G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/9 | 5 | ||||
KHK | ENST00000490823.5 | n.129+103G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00775 AC: 1180AN: 152208Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1180
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0103 AC: 2806AN: 272228Hom.: 34 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.0108 AC XY: 1525AN XY: 140876
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2806
AN:
272228
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
1525
AN XY:
140876
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00773 AC: 1178AN: 152326Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00832 AC XY: 620AN XY: 74500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1178
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
620
AN XY:
74500
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
26
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Essential fructosuria Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at