2-68380815-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002664.3(PLEK):c.291G>T(p.Lys97Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.292 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 76,985 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002664.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEK | NM_002664.3 | c.291G>T | p.Lys97Asn | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000234313.8 | NP_002655.2 | |
PLEK | XM_047444772.1 | c.291G>T | p.Lys97Asn | missense_variant | 3/8 | XP_047300728.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEK | ENST00000234313.8 | c.291G>T | p.Lys97Asn | missense_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_002664.3 | ENSP00000234313.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.302 AC: 45860AN: 152000Hom.: 7653 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.362 AC: 90821AN: 251010Hom.: 19384 AF XY: 0.359 AC XY: 48656AN XY: 135632
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.291 AC: 425625AN: 1461404Hom.: 69337 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.295 AC XY: 214818AN XY: 726986
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.302 AC: 45887AN: 152116Hom.: 7648 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.308 AC XY: 22944AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 27, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at