2-70935936-C-T

Position:

chr2-70935936-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001692.4(ATP6V1B1):c.-19C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00102 in 1,603,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0056 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

ATP6V1B1
NM_001692.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00900

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATP6V1B1 (HGNC:853): (ATPase H+ transporting V1 subunit B1) This gene encodes a component of vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase), a multisubunit enzyme that mediates acidification of eukaryotic intracellular organelles. V-ATPase dependent organelle acidification is necessary for such intracellular processes as protein sorting, zymogen activation, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and synaptic vesicle proton gradient generation. V-ATPase is composed of a cytosolic V1 domain and a transmembrane V0 domain. The V1 domain consists of three A and three B subunits, two G subunits plus the C, D, E, F, and H subunits. The V1 domain contains the ATP catalytic site. The V0 domain consists of five different subunits: a, c, c', c'', and d. Additional isoforms of many of the V1 and V0 subunit proteins are encoded by multiple genes or alternatively spliced transcript variants. This encoded protein is one of two V1 domain B subunit isoforms and is found in the kidney. Mutations in this gene cause distal renal tubular acidosis associated with sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ATP6V1B1 links:

VAX2 (HGNC:12661): (ventral anterior homeobox 2) This gene encodes a homeobox protein and is almost exclusively expressed in the ventral portion of the retina during development. In mouse studies, this gene was found to be required for the correct formation of the optic fissure and other aspects of retinal development. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2008]

VAX2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 2-70935936-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-70935936-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 684162.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00556 (847/152264) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0193 (803/41548). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0182. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 389 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATP6V1B1	NM_001692.4 link	c.-19C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/14	ENST00000234396.10	NP_001683.2	P15313

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATP6V1B1	ENST00000234396 link	c.-19C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/14	1	NM_001692.4	ENSP00000234396.4		P15313

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00555

AC:

845

AN:

152146

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00144

AC:

356

AN:

246862

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000966

AC XY:

129

AN XY:

133564

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0208

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000588

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000898

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000334

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000546

AC:

792

AN:

1451560

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000446

AC XY:

322

AN XY:

721248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0208

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000541

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000350

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000906

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000985

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00556

AC:

847

AN:

152264

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00522

AC XY:

389

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0193

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.000773

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00652

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal tubular acidosis with progressive nerve deafness

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jun 01, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

4.1

DANN

Benign

0.59

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over