20-4699732-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000379440.9(PRNP):āc.512A>Gā(p.Asn171Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00273 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 99 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000379440.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNP | NM_000311.5 | c.512A>G | p.Asn171Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000379440.9 | NP_000302.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNP | ENST00000379440.9 | c.512A>G | p.Asn171Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_000311.5 | ENSP00000368752 | P1 | |
PRNP | ENST00000424424.2 | c.512A>G | p.Asn171Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000411599 | P1 | ||
PRNP | ENST00000430350.2 | c.512A>G | p.Asn171Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000399376 | P1 | ||
PRNP | ENST00000457586.2 | c.512A>G | p.Asn171Ser | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | ENSP00000415284 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0149 AC: 2266AN: 152042Hom.: 50 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00377 AC: 949AN: 251490Hom.: 29 AF XY: 0.00282 AC XY: 383AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00146 AC: 2131AN: 1461892Hom.: 49 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00122 AC XY: 890AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0150 AC: 2277AN: 152160Hom.: 50 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0144 AC XY: 1070AN XY: 74400
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 22, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 23, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 22717776, 20981092, 9384372) - |
Spongiform encephalopathy with neuropsychiatric features Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Feb 01, 2012 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Inherited prion disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Huntington disease-like 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at