20-62881109-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001193369.2(DIDO1):c.4847C>T(p.Ser1616Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000268 in 1,609,502 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001193369.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIDO1 | NM_001193369.2 | c.4847C>T | p.Ser1616Phe | missense_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000395343.6 | NP_001180298.1 | |
DIDO1 | NM_033081.3 | c.4847C>T | p.Ser1616Phe | missense_variant | 16/16 | NP_149072.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIDO1 | ENST00000395343.6 | c.4847C>T | p.Ser1616Phe | missense_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_001193369.2 | ENSP00000378752 | P2 | |
DIDO1 | ENST00000266070.8 | c.4847C>T | p.Ser1616Phe | missense_variant | 16/16 | 5 | ENSP00000266070 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00118 AC: 180AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000331 AC: 76AN: 229394Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000220 AC XY: 28AN XY: 127546
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000172 AC: 250AN: 1457146Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000139 AC XY: 101AN XY: 725004
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00119 AC: 182AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00113 AC XY: 84AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at