3-13322283-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_024923.4(NUP210):c.4825A>G(p.Ile1609Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Consequence
NUP210
NM_024923.4 missense
NM_024923.4 missense
Scores
19
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.694
Genes affected
NUP210 (HGNC:30052): (nucleoporin 210) The nuclear pore complex is a massive structure that extends across the nuclear envelope, forming a gateway that regulates the flow of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Nucleoporins are the main components of the nuclear pore complex in eukaryotic cells. The protein encoded by this gene is a membrane-spanning glycoprotein that is a major component of the nuclear pore complex. Multiple pseudogenes related to this gene are located on chromosome 3. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.17442822).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUP210 | NM_024923.4 | c.4825A>G | p.Ile1609Val | missense_variant | 35/40 | ENST00000254508.7 | NP_079199.2 | |
NUP210 | XM_047447795.1 | c.2209A>G | p.Ile737Val | missense_variant | 17/22 | XP_047303751.1 | ||
NUP210 | XM_047447797.1 | c.2176A>G | p.Ile726Val | missense_variant | 17/22 | XP_047303753.1 | ||
NUP210 | XM_047447796.1 | c.2140A>G | p.Ile714Val | missense_variant | 17/22 | XP_047303752.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUP210 | ENST00000254508.7 | c.4825A>G | p.Ile1609Val | missense_variant | 35/40 | 2 | NM_024923.4 | ENSP00000254508 | P1 | |
NUP210 | ENST00000695491.1 | n.2827A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 21/22 | ||||||
NUP210 | ENST00000695490.1 | c.*253A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 17/22 | ENSP00000511960 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 10, 2023 | The c.4825A>G (p.I1609V) alteration is located in exon 35 (coding exon 35) of the NUP210 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 4825, causing the isoleucine (I) at amino acid position 1609 to be replaced by a valine (V). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of helix (P = 0.1299);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at