3-8745644-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 4P and 12B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_033337.3(CAV3):c.233C>T(p.Thr78Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T78K) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033337.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAV3 | NM_033337.3 | c.233C>T | p.Thr78Met | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000343849.3 | NP_203123.1 | |
CAV3 | NM_001234.5 | c.233C>T | p.Thr78Met | missense_variant | 2/3 | NP_001225.1 | ||
OXTR | XR_007095681.1 | n.1885-3042G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAV3 | ENST00000343849.3 | c.233C>T | p.Thr78Met | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_033337.3 | ENSP00000341940.2 | ||
CAV3 | ENST00000397368.2 | c.233C>T | p.Thr78Met | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | ENSP00000380525.2 | |||
CAV3 | ENST00000472766.1 | n.155+11654C>T | intron_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00301 AC: 458AN: 152198Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00263 AC: 660AN: 250926Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00262 AC XY: 355AN XY: 135622
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00243 AC: 3559AN: 1461784Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00243 AC XY: 1764AN XY: 727178
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00301 AC: 459AN: 152316Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00290 AC XY: 216AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 15, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | - | Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. We have classified this variant as likely benign or perhaps conferring low and multifactorial risk (as opposed to causing Mendelian disease). This assessment is based on the presence of the variant in general population samples (reviewed below) and the fact that many of the cases of Mendelian disease with this variant also have a different pathogenic variant in another gene. The CAV3 variant has been reported in 3 unrelated individuals with long QT syndrome, 3 SIDS cases , 1 individual with dilated cardiomyopathy and 1 idiopathic hyper-CK-emia proband (Arnestad et al 2007; Cronk et al 2007; Vatta et al 2006). This is a non-conservative amino acid change with a polar Threonine replaced with a nonpolar Methionine. Threonine is highly conserved at position 78 and studies indicate that this region of the CAV3 gene (codons 74-100) codes for a functionally significant domain of the CAV3 protein (Traverso et al 2008). This domain seems to be involved in caveolae organelle formation in muscle cells however there is no data on function of this region in relation to cardiomyocites. Arnestad et al (2007) identified the variant in 1 out of 182 control individuals. Many of the individuals reported in the literature with this variant also had another variant that was deemed pathogenic. This would suggest that the variant as observed coincidentally. Based on these data, it is unlikely that this CAV3 variant causes Mendelian disease. It remains unknown whether it may contribute to cardiac risk in a more subtle fashion. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 12, 2015 | p.Thr78Met in exon 2 of CAV3: This variant has been reported in 1 individual wit h idiopathic hyper-CK-emia, 3 individuals with LQTS (one of whom had a second pa thogenic variant), 1 individual with DCM and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (hom ozygous for this variant), and 1 infant with SIDS, and was not detected in >1500 control chromosomes (Reijneveld 2006, Vatta 2006, Cronk 2007, Traverso 2008). H owever, this variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it ha s been identified in 0.4% (276/66492) of European chromosomes and 0.46% (48/1037 6) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac .broadinstitute.org/, dbSNP rs72546668). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Aug 16, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Feb 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 30, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | Apr 27, 2019 | - - |
not provided Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 13, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17275750, 24123366, 23640888, 18253147, 24070816, 24021552, 23465283, 22378279, 22245016, 22595201, 17060380, 26656175, 26159999, 27312022, 29367541, 28648120, 28898996, 30986657, 28988457, 31019283, 31043699) - |
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (CAV3) | Apr 15, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 02, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | CAV3: PM5, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 22, 2016 | Variant Summary: CAV3 c.233C>T (p.T78M) affects a conserved nucleotide and 4/5 in-silico tools predict this variant to be damaging. The variant is located within the central hydrophobic transmembrane domain (amino acids 75106) of caveolin-3 and has previously been reported to be disease causing. In vitro functional studies have shown that T78M interacts with the cardiac sodium channel to promote increased persistent current. However, it may be meaningless to assess the effects that CAV3 mutations have on a single ion channel without being able to assess the effect on the action potential as a whole due to the complex regulatory nature of the different cardiac ion channels that localize within caveolae. Therefore, the finding that T78M CAV3 expressed heterologously in HEK293 cell lines stably expressing the most common (Q1077del) variant of SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel can cause a five-fold increase in late sodium current should not be considered strong evidence for pathogenicity. Detection of CAV3 T78M in unrelated patients with various diseases has led to its repeated labeling as pathogenic in the literature. However, many of these patients had a co-occurrence that could explain most, if not all, of the presenting phenotype. Additionally, T78M was found in 379/124242 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0030505, which is more than 121 times the maximal expected frequency of a CAV3 pathogenic allele (0.000025), suggesting this variant is a benign polymorphism. Patient observations and limited in vitro characterization are not sufficient to conclude that CAV T78M is pathogenic. It is possible that CAV3 T78M may exert a pathogenic effect in association with other genetic factors, however in isolation, the evidence strongly supports a benign classification of this variant. Additionally, several reputable labs classify the variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. - |
Long QT syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept of Medical Biology, Uskudar University | Jan 08, 2024 | Criteria: PP2, PP3, BS1 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Long QT syndrome 9 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Feb 01, 2007 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne | Nov 21, 2018 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Mar 22, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 05, 2018 | - - |
Long QT syndrome 2/9, digenic Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Feb 01, 2007 | - - |
Caveolinopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Zaffran Lab, Genetics of Cardiac Diseases Laboratory, Marseille Medical Genetics | - | - - |
Long QT syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
CAV3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 19, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 28, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at