4-153466414-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001131007.2(TMEM131L):c.17G>A(p.Arg6His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000303 in 1,351,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R6L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001131007.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001131007.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM131L | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.17G>A | p.Arg6His | missense | Exon 1 of 35 | ENSP00000386787.3 | A2VDJ0-5 | ||
| TMEM131L | TSL:5 | c.17G>A | p.Arg6His | missense | Exon 1 of 35 | ENSP00000386574.3 | A2VDJ0-1 | ||
| TMEM131L | c.17G>A | p.Arg6His | missense | Exon 1 of 35 | ENSP00000556606.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000190 AC: 1AN: 52748 AF XY: 0.0000324 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000317 AC: 38AN: 1200328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000324 AC XY: 19AN XY: 586622 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000271 AC XY: 2AN XY: 73826 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at