4-54733102-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000222.3(KIT):​c.2394C>T​(p.Ile798Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0282 in 1,611,398 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 795 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 65 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.029 ( 730 hom. )

Consequence

KIT
NM_000222.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.411
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIT (HGNC:6342): (KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. This gene was initially identified as a homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit and is often referred to as proto-oncogene c-Kit. The canonical form of this glycosylated transmembrane protein has an N-terminal extracellular region with five immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain at the C-terminus. Upon activation by its cytokine ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), this protein phosphorylates multiple intracellular proteins that play a role in in the proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis of many cell types and thereby plays an important role in hematopoiesis, stem cell maintenance, gametogenesis, melanogenesis, and in mast cell development, migration and function. This protein can be a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mast cell disease, acute myelogenous leukemia, and piebaldism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.24).
BP6
Variant 4-54733102-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54733102-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255571.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-54733102-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr4-54733102-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.411 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0208 (3164/152232) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0321 (2182/68002). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.031. There are 65 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1461 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 3164 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KITNM_000222.3 linkc.2394C>T p.Ile798Ile synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 21 ENST00000288135.6 NP_000213.1 P10721-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KITENST00000288135.6 linkc.2394C>T p.Ile798Ile synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 21 1 NM_000222.3 ENSP00000288135.6 P10721-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0208
AC:
3167
AN:
152114
Hom.:
65
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00596
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.182
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0321
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0204
AC:
5127
AN:
251082
Hom.:
73
AF XY:
0.0210
AC XY:
2849
AN XY:
135692
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00622
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00977
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0332
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0290
AC:
42272
AN:
1459166
Hom.:
730
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0287
AC XY:
20808
AN XY:
726060
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00452
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000505
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0236
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0208
AC:
3164
AN:
152232
Hom.:
65
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0196
AC XY:
1461
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00595
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0321
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0189
Alfa
AF:
0.0278
Hom.:
39
Bravo
AF:
0.0217
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0326
EpiControl
AF:
0.0353

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Aug 24, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:4
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 19, 2024
Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
May 08, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 29, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 18, 2024
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BA1, BP4, BP7 c.2394C>T, located in exon 17 of the KIT gene, is predicted to result in no amino acid change, p.(Ile798=) (BP7). This variant is found in 5369/267938 (77 homozygous), with a filter allele frequency of 1.94% at 99% confidence in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database (non-cancer data set)(BA1). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP4). To our knowledge, no relevant functional studies has been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in the ClinVar database (4 likely benign, 10x benign). Based on currently available information, c.2394C>T is classified as a benign variant according to ACMG guidelines. -

Mastocytosis Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Piebaldism Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
8.8
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55789615; hg19: chr4-55599268; COSMIC: COSV55386746; API