5-1253665-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.*63C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00217 in 1,435,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 32 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BP6
Variant 5-1253665-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1253665-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 350516.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0105 (1600/152332) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0359 (1493/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0344. There are 32 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 769 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 32 AR,AD,SD,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TERTNM_198253.3 linkc.*63C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 ENST00000310581.10 NP_937983.2 O14746-1
TERTNM_001193376.3 linkc.*63C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 15 of 15 NP_001180305.1 O14746-3
TERTNR_149162.3 linkn.3170C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 13
TERTNR_149163.3 linkn.3134C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TERTENST00000310581.10 linkc.*63C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 16 1 NM_198253.3 ENSP00000309572.5 O14746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0105
AC:
1591
AN:
152214
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0358
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0105
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00118
AC:
1512
AN:
1283610
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
19
AF XY:
0.000993
AC XY:
638
AN XY:
642494
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0369
AC:
1125
AN:
30504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
59
AN:
37528
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00475
AC:
117
AN:
24656
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000185
AC:
7
AN:
37930
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000634
AC:
5
AN:
78822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
46732
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00200
AC:
9
AN:
4492
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000609
AC:
59
AN:
968376
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00240
AC:
131
AN:
54570
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
87
174
262
349
436
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0105
AC:
1600
AN:
152332
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0103
AC XY:
769
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0359
AC:
1493
AN:
41576
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00359
AC:
55
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00432
AC:
15
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000206
AC:
14
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
22
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
78
156
233
311
389
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00602
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.0122
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
Feb 14, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
0.71
DANN
Benign
0.47
PhyloP100
-1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5031049; hg19: chr5-1253780; API