5-132369947-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):c.-26G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000243 in 1,610,838 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003060.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000281 AC: 68AN: 241740 AF XY: 0.000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000245 AC: 357AN: 1458486Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000266 AC XY: 193AN XY: 725494 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74502 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Renal carnitine transport defect Uncertain:1Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at