5-16475146-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_001034850.3(RETREG1):āc.1089T>Cā(p.Asp363Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000489 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00076 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00046 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RETREG1
NM_001034850.3 synonymous
NM_001034850.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.569
Genes affected
RETREG1 (HGNC:25964): (reticulophagy regulator 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a cis-Golgi transmembrane protein that may be necessary for the long-term survival of nociceptive and autonomic ganglion neurons. Mutations in this gene are a cause of hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IIB (HSAN IIB), and this gene may also play a role in susceptibility to vascular dementia. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
Variant 5-16475146-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-16475146-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 352686.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr5-16475146-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.569 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000755 (115/152256) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00124 (6/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000782. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 64 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETREG1 | NM_001034850.3 | c.1089T>C | p.Asp363Asp | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000306320.10 | NP_001030022.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETREG1 | ENST00000306320.10 | c.1089T>C | p.Asp363Asp | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_001034850.3 | ENSP00000304642.9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000756 AC: 115AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
115
AN:
152138
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000646 AC: 161AN: 249156Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000577 AC XY: 78AN XY: 135186
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
161
AN:
249156
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
135186
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000462 AC: 675AN: 1461666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000454 AC XY: 330AN XY: 727136
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
675
AN:
1461666
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
330
AN XY:
727136
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000755 AC: 115AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000860 AC XY: 64AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
115
AN:
152256
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2022 | RETREG1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 08, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 11, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at