6-32041097-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM2PM5PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000500.9(CYP21A2):āc.1451G>Cā(p.Arg484Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000682 in 1,582,546 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R484?) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000500.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP21A2 | NM_000500.9 | c.1451G>C | p.Arg484Pro | missense_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000644719.2 | |
CYP21A2 | NM_001128590.4 | c.1361G>C | p.Arg454Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 | ||
CYP21A2 | NM_001368143.2 | c.1046G>C | p.Arg349Pro | missense_variant | 10/10 | ||
CYP21A2 | NM_001368144.2 | c.1046G>C | p.Arg349Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP21A2 | ENST00000644719.2 | c.1451G>C | p.Arg484Pro | missense_variant | 10/10 | NM_000500.9 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000352 AC: 53AN: 150672Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000330 AC: 75AN: 227246Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000305 AC XY: 38AN XY: 124498
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000717 AC: 1027AN: 1431756Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000679 AC XY: 484AN XY: 712384
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000351 AC: 53AN: 150790Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000231 AC XY: 17AN XY: 73644
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency Pathogenic:2Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, flagged submission | clinical testing | Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital | Mar 10, 2021 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | 3billion | May 22, 2022 | The variant is observed at an extremely low frequency in the gnomAD v2.1.1 dataset (total allele frequency: 0.033%). However, frequency data for this variant in the general population cannot be distinguished from that of the CYP21P pseudogene, and are therefore uninformative in assessment of variant pathogenicity. In silico tool predictions suggest damaging effect of the variant on gene or gene product (REVEL: 0.66; 3Cnet: 0.29). Same nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as pathogenic/likely pathogenic with strong evidence (ClinVar ID: VCV001264335). A different missense change at the same codon (p.Arg484Gln, p.Arg484Trp) has been reported to be associated with CYP21A2 related disorder (ClinVar ID: VCV000585750 / PMID: 12915679, 14715874). Therefore, this variant is classified as likely pathogenic according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Christian Medical College | - | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 25, 2015 | The CYP21A2 c.1451G>C (p.Arg484Pro) pathogenic variant (also known as R483P) has been described to cause markedly decreased CYP21A2 activity and stability, and identified in individuals with CAH, mainly of the salt-wasting phenotype (PMID: 9497336 (1998), 15994751 (2005), 20926536 (2011), and 23359698 (2013), 32616876 (2020)). Based on the available information, this variant is classified as pathogenic. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at