6-51632705-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):c.11525G>T(p.Arg3842Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0204 in 1,612,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 441 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138694.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | NM_138694.4 | c.11525G>T | p.Arg3842Leu | missense_variant | 65/67 | ENST00000371117.8 | NP_619639.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | ENST00000371117.8 | c.11525G>T | p.Arg3842Leu | missense_variant | 65/67 | 1 | NM_138694.4 | ENSP00000360158.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0174 AC: 2636AN: 151844Hom.: 36 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0189 AC: 4729AN: 250844Hom.: 68 AF XY: 0.0192 AC XY: 2609AN XY: 135558
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0207 AC: 30239AN: 1460986Hom.: 406 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0207 AC XY: 15058AN XY: 726798
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0173 AC: 2633AN: 151962Hom.: 35 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0181 AC XY: 1347AN XY: 74240
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 15, 2013 | - - |
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 11, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 12, 2016 | Variant summary: The PKHD1 c.11525G>T (p.Arg3842Leu) variant causes a missense change involving a non-conserved nucleotide, which in silico tools predict conflicting results, 2/4 predict "benign" and 2/4 predict "damaging." This variant was found in 2160/121714 control chromosomes (including 21 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0177465, which is approximately 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PKHD1 variant (0.0070711), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. The variant is more common in European subpopulations from ExAC with allele frequencies of 3-4%. In literature, the variant has also been reported as a polymorphism or a benign variant found in ARPKD patients (Bergmann_2005, Sharp_2005, Gunay-Aygun_2010). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 20, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15698423, 19914852) - |
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PKHD1 p.Arg3842Leu variant was identified in 8 of 636 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from European, Dutch and American individuals or families with ARPKD and was present in 11 of 600 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from healthy individuals (Sharp_2005_15805161, Losekoot_2005_16133180, Gunay-Aygun_2010_19914852, Bergmann_2005_15698423). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs76572975) “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (benign by EGL Genetic Diagnostics (Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics), Prevention Genetics and Invitae), RWTH AAachen University ARPKD database, and was not identified in the COGR and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 5207 (73 homozygous) of 276514 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.02 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 77 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Other in 113 (2 homozygous) of 6444 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Latino in 402 (4 homozygous) of 34320 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), European Non-Finnish in 3049 (41 homozygous) of 126226 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Ashkenazi Jewish in 241 (3 homozygous) of 10130 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), European Finnish in 1066 (23 homozygous) of 25770 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), and South Asian in 259 of 30778 chromosomes (freq: 0.008); it was not observed in the East Asian populations. The p.Arg3842 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of the variant Leu to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at