6-64066431-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PM1PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.6632C>T(p.Ser2211Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,549,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001142800.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYS | NM_001142800.2 | c.6632C>T | p.Ser2211Leu | missense_variant | 33/43 | ENST00000503581.6 | NP_001136272.1 | |
EYS | NM_001292009.2 | c.6632C>T | p.Ser2211Leu | missense_variant | 33/44 | NP_001278938.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYS | ENST00000503581.6 | c.6632C>T | p.Ser2211Leu | missense_variant | 33/43 | 5 | NM_001142800.2 | ENSP00000424243.1 | ||
EYS | ENST00000370621.7 | c.6632C>T | p.Ser2211Leu | missense_variant | 33/44 | 1 | ENSP00000359655.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000351 AC: 55AN: 156660Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000253 AC XY: 21AN XY: 82904
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000229 AC: 320AN: 1397196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000225 AC XY: 155AN XY: 689274
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00139 AC: 211AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00129 AC XY: 96AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | The EYS c.6632C>T (p.Ser2211Leu) missense variant has been reported in two studies and is found in a total of five individuals with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa, including in two siblings in a compound heterozygous state, in two in a heterozygous state, and in one individual who was also heterozygous for a stop-gained variant and another missense variant, though phase is not described (Audo et al. 2010, Barragan et al. 2010). The p.Ser2211Leu variant was absent from 680 controls (Audo et al. 2010, Barragan et al. 2010). The Ser221 residue is conserved in EYS homologues. The p.Ser2211Leu variant is reported at a frequency of 0.00434 in the African American population of the Exome Sequencing Project. The evidence for this variant is limited. The p.Ser2211Leu variant is classified as unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital | Jan 02, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 27, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 16, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21069908, 20333770) - |
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at