7-107715429-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.2326C>T(p.Arg776Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00267 in 1,612,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
SLC26A4
NM_000441.2 missense
NM_000441.2 missense
Scores
2
11
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.26
Genes affected
SLC26A4 (HGNC:8818): (solute carrier family 26 member 4) Mutations in this gene are associated with Pendred syndrome, the most common form of syndromic deafness, an autosomal-recessive disease. It is highly homologous to the SLC26A3 gene; they have similar genomic structures and this gene is located 3' of the SLC26A3 gene. The encoded protein has homology to sulfate transporters. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PM1
In a topological_domain Cytoplasmic (size 272) in uniprot entity S26A4_HUMAN there are 26 pathogenic changes around while only 8 benign (76%) in NM_000441.2
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.027159065).
BP6
Variant 7-107715429-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-107715429-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43547.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr7-107715429-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A4 | NM_000441.2 | c.2326C>T | p.Arg776Cys | missense_variant | 21/21 | ENST00000644269.2 | NP_000432.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC26A4 | ENST00000644269.2 | c.2326C>T | p.Arg776Cys | missense_variant | 21/21 | NM_000441.2 | ENSP00000494017.1 | |||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000492030.2 | n.512C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/6 | 5 | |||||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000644846.1 | n.*228C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/10 | ENSP00000494344.1 | |||||
SLC26A4 | ENST00000644846.1 | n.*228C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENSP00000494344.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00178 AC: 270AN: 152090Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
270
AN:
152090
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00181 AC: 455AN: 251434Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00191 AC XY: 260AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
455
AN:
251434
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
260
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00276 AC: 4030AN: 1460752Hom.: 7 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00265 AC XY: 1926AN XY: 726758
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4030
AN:
1460752
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
1926
AN XY:
726758
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00177 AC: 270AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 134AN XY: 74432
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
270
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
134
AN XY:
74432
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
10
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
14
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
AC:
243
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | SLC26A4: BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 03, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Pendred syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jul 02, 2015 | p.Arg776Cys in exon 21 of SLC26A4: This variant has been reported in six proband s with non-syndromic hearing loss with/without EVA (Pryor 2005, Choi 2009, Hutch in 2005, Pourova 2010). However, haplotype analysis in one of the reported famil ies showed inconsistent segregation of the SLC26A4 gene in an affected sibling, suggesting that SLC26A4 mutations were not the primary cause of hearing loss in that family. This variant has been identified in 0.5% (33/6614) of Finnish chro mosomes and in 0.3% (192/66740) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs111033255). In addit ion, this variant has now been identified in our laboratory in 2 patients with a nother genetic cause of their hearing loss. In addition, two independent functio nal studies show that the variant allele had a similar function to wildtype (Pfa rr 2006, Choi 2009). In summary, the current data suggest that this variant is l ikely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 18, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 19, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;.
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at