7-6008987-C-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001406875.1(PMS2):c.-642G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00268 in 1,612,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 12 hom. )
Consequence
PMS2
NM_001406875.1 5_prime_UTR
NM_001406875.1 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.613
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 7-6008987-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132730.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | NM_000535.7 | c.23+10G>C | intron_variant | ENST00000265849.12 | NP_000526.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMS2 | ENST00000265849.12 | c.23+10G>C | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000535.7 | ENSP00000265849.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00181 AC: 275AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
275
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00180 AC: 451AN: 250374Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00183 AC XY: 248AN XY: 135600
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
451
AN:
250374
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
248
AN XY:
135600
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00277 AC: 4049AN: 1460294Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00273 AC XY: 1984AN XY: 726450
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4049
AN:
1460294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1984
AN XY:
726450
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00181 AC: 275AN: 152340Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00165 AC XY: 123AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
275
AN:
152340
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
123
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PMS2 c.23+10G>C variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the following databases: COGR, Clinvitae, Cosmic, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs192027828) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Ambry Genetics; and likely benign by Counsyl and Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago)), and in control databases in 496 (2 homozygous) of 276428 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant in certain populations (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 16 of 23946 chromosomes (freq. 0.0007), other in 10 of 6460 chromosomes (freq. 0.002), Latino in 31 of 34414 chromosomes (freq. 0.0009), European Non-Finnish in 365 (2 homozygous) of 126042 chromosomes (freq. 0.003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10138 chromosomes (freq:0.0001), European Finnish in 42 of 25794 chromosomes (freq:0.002) and South Asian in 31 of 30776 chromosomes (freq. 0.001); it was not seen in the East Asian population. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 17, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 24, 2017 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Feb 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 21, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 08, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Jul 11, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 31, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Nov 22, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 01, 2015 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 29, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at