7-6008987-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_001406875.1(PMS2):​c.-642G>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00268 in 1,612,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_001406875.1 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.613
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 7-6008987-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132730.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-6008987-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.23+10G>C intron_variant ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2 P54278-1Q7Z3Q2B4DGM0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.23+10G>C intron_variant 1 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7 P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00181
AC:
275
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000796
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00304
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00180
AC:
451
AN:
250374
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
248
AN XY:
135600
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000497
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00277
AC:
4049
AN:
1460294
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00273
AC XY:
1984
AN XY:
726450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000538
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000870
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00251
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
275
AN:
152340
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00165
AC XY:
123
AN XY:
74502
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00304
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00201
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00175
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 07, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PMS2 c.23+10G>C variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the following databases: COGR, Clinvitae, Cosmic, MutDB, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs192027828) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Ambry Genetics; and likely benign by Counsyl and Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago)), and in control databases in 496 (2 homozygous) of 276428 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant in certain populations (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 16 of 23946 chromosomes (freq. 0.0007), other in 10 of 6460 chromosomes (freq. 0.002), Latino in 31 of 34414 chromosomes (freq. 0.0009), European Non-Finnish in 365 (2 homozygous) of 126042 chromosomes (freq. 0.003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10138 chromosomes (freq:0.0001), European Finnish in 42 of 25794 chromosomes (freq:0.002) and South Asian in 31 of 30776 chromosomes (freq. 0.001); it was not seen in the East Asian population. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 17, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 24, 2017- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtFeb 05, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 21, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 08, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJul 11, 2016- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 31, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 18, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Nov 22, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 01, 2015- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 29, 2023- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
4.5
DANN
Benign
0.71
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192027828; hg19: chr7-6048618; COSMIC: COSV104550746; COSMIC: COSV104550746; API