8-64615112-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004820.5(CYP7B1):c.971G>A(p.Arg324His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0367 in 1,613,552 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,319 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004820.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP7B1 | NM_004820.5 | c.971G>A | p.Arg324His | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000310193.4 | NP_004811.1 | |
CYP7B1 | NM_001324112.2 | c.971G>A | p.Arg324His | missense_variant | 4/7 | NP_001311041.1 | ||
CYP7B1 | XM_017014002.2 | c.1037G>A | p.Arg346His | missense_variant | 5/7 | XP_016869491.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP7B1 | ENST00000310193.4 | c.971G>A | p.Arg324His | missense_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_004820.5 | ENSP00000310721.3 | ||
CYP7B1 | ENST00000523954.1 | n.245G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/5 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0275 AC: 4178AN: 152016Hom.: 91 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0343 AC: 8608AN: 251132Hom.: 208 AF XY: 0.0371 AC XY: 5039AN XY: 135718
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0377 AC: 55056AN: 1461418Hom.: 1228 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0382 AC XY: 27789AN XY: 727016
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0275 AC: 4180AN: 152134Hom.: 91 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0260 AC XY: 1933AN XY: 74368
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 21, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 30, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Nov 11, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary spastic paraplegia 5A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at